![]() But you also get an even brighter aperture with shallower depth of field and a quick HSM autofocus drive. The Sigma 35mm F1.2, meanwhile, is a lot larger, weighs nearly twice as much and at $1499 costs around two-thirds more than the F1.4. Sigma's 35mm F2 is more consumer-friendly, with a slightly less bright aperture and weather-sealing only at the lens mount, but it's smaller, lighter and at $639, costs almost a third less. And for Sony shooters, the excellent Sony FE 35mm F1.4 G Master lens is definitely worthy of consideration. The Sigma 35mm F2 DG DN and 35mm F1.2 DG DN for example are available for both E-mount and L-mount. Compared to the earlier versions of the 35mm F1.4 Art lens, this new model has shrunk by 8mm (0.3") in length, and shed a not insignificant 110-115g (3.9-4.1 oz) in weight.Īs well as the earlier lens, which remains available as of this writing for a discounted price of $799, the new 35mm F1.4 DG DN has several other direct competitors. It's not quite the night-and-day difference we saw with the recent Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art, but it's still quite noticeable. It was subsequently modified for compatibility with E-mount and L-mount mirrorless cameras as well, but this compatibility came at the expense of increased weight and barrel length, to account for the decreased flange-back distance of the mirrorless systems.īy contrast, the new lens is designed specifically to take advantage of the shorter flange-back distance of mirrorless cameras. The 'original' 35mm F1.4 Art from 2012 was designed for use with D/SLR cameras, whose sales at that point still dwarfed those of the fledgling mirrorless market.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |